| ▲ | 47872324 11 hours ago | |||||||
exe.dev. 111 IN A 52.35.87.134 52.35.87.134 <- Amazon Technologies Inc. (AT-88-Z) | ||||||||
| ▲ | crawshaw 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Hello, author here. Our exe.dev web UI still runs on AWS. We also have a few users left on our VM hosts there, as when we launched in December we were considering building on AWS. Now almost all customer VMs are on other bare metal providers or machines we are racking ourselves. We built our own GLB with the help of another vendor's anycast network. You can see that if you try any of the exe.xyz names generated for user VMs. We would move exe.dev too, but we have a few customers who are compliance sensitive going through it, so we need to get the compliance story right with our own hardware before we can. It is a little annoying being tied to AWS just for that, but very little of our traffic goes through them, so in practice it works. | ||||||||
| ▲ | skybrian 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Their first location (PDX) is on Amazon I believe and not accepting new customers. They’ve said it’s much more expensive for them than the others. Their other locations are listed here: | ||||||||
| ▲ | MagicMoonlight 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Well yes, because they needed high availability and flexibility and tons of features… Hey wait a minute! | ||||||||
| ▲ | awhitty 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
"I am white labeling a cloud" | ||||||||
| ||||||||