We don't have this kind of tooling built up, but we've been using Linear as a source of truth alongside a human written prompt adding context. It's worked really well for both feature development and bug hunting, and helps keep us honest with tickets (good LLM context is still good human context) as well as maintain some level of consistency between LLM passes on the same issue.

▲

yzhong94 5 hours ago | parent [-]

100% on using linear as the source of truth! We went a bit further and just use Linear as the prompt. So there isn't a human written one adding context that lives elsewhere

	▲	jmathai 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This has been great for me too. Every feature starts and completes with /gh-issue <issue number>. Every issue is created with /spec and a conversation with a human. Once the spec is materialized as an issue it’s sufficient for an agent to implement. Everything is documented. It’s amazing.