| ▲ | pixl97 11 hours ago | |
The last point is what they mean. The Senate causes a number of problems with it's setup. But even the House and how small it is causes further problems. The number of reps there needs to go up by many many times. | ||
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
To add, there are many proposals[1] for Senate[2] reform[3]. Even a cursory glance reveals[4] an abundance[5] of different[6] suggestions[7]. 1. https://dc.law.utah.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1378&con... 2. https://casten.house.gov/imo/media/doc/senate_constitutional... 3. https://democracybillofrights.org/how-and-why-to-reform-the-... 4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S09626... 5. https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/casten-introdu... 6. https://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/RI... 7. https://electoral-reform.org.uk/when-it-comes-to-fair-votes-... | ||
| ▲ | danaris 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
And that's not baked into the Constitution—it was set by law in the early 1900s, and could be changed by law. If we were to uncap the size of the House of Representatives, and instead change so that each district contains 50k people (or close to it), we would have roughly 7k representatives in the House. That would effectively eliminate the disproportionate advantage small states have there. (It would not, of course, do anything about the Senate; that would have to be addressed separately.) | ||