Just another handout. Ironically many of the recipients of said hand outs oppose social welfare programs.

tombert 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think the theoretical idea is that we want to ensure that there is always a very large domestic corn supply, in the event of war or something. Corn is a crop that has a lot of uses; it can be refined into sugar, it can be used as flour, it's relatively energy dense food-wise, and it can be fairly easily converted into fuel if necessary.

I'm not saying I fully agree with the reasoning but I at least kind of get it.

	▲	testaccount28 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		right. view it instead as "we need to keep domestic corn production above a certain threshold." the result is that we have a lot of extra corn. now the question becomes: what do we do with this extra corn? we can either throw it away, or turn it into fuel. it's not an efficient course if the target is fuel, but that's not the target. it is a decent use if we have lots of corn that nobody wants, which we do.

▲

jmclnx 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I would say it is even worse, it is a scam to feed $ to the rich due to Gov subsidizes.

Plus, IIRC, ethanol is used as a way to make people think it is OK to use fossil fuels allowing the oil industry to point to these farms. Plus I heard too high an ethanol mixture can damage your engine, thus adding to "planned obsolescence".

▲

dotcoma 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Socialism for the rich and rugged capitalism for the poor -- MLK