I have said it before in another comment - on a related post.

It's wild that Southern US which gets most of the sun - has relatively little solar compared to the North - which gets less sun days - but has more solar.

the damage politics has done to the US is crazy n sad.

▲ Jblx2 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Is this blog potentially suspect/misleading? Up-thread someone pointed out another source for PV production with rankings:

  1 - California
  2 - Texas
  3 - Florida
  4 - Arizona
  5 - North Carolina
  6 - Nevada
  7 - New York

https://seia.org/solar-state-by-state/

And here's a different source for residential PV:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1419901/us-residential-g...

  1 - California
  2 - Arizona
  3 - Texas
  4 - Florida
  5 - New York

Is there any chance that people are jumping to incorrect conclusions?

▲ rendang an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sunbelt states are mostly pretty high

https://www.chooseenergy.com/solar-energy/solar-energy-produ...

▲ rootusrootus 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Optimistically, I would expect to see more panels in raw numbers up north due to necessarily overbuilding the capacity to account for fewer sun-hours per year.

▲

rconti 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Well also the desert southwest is still relatively sparsely populated, so rooftop solar won't show up as much on a map like this. Plus their power is cheap(er) than CA.

But yeah, you'd expect some bigger utility-scale installations.

	▲	lazide an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Many utility scale solar plants are indeed being built out in the desert. The Antelope Valley and along the 15 corridor in particular, as they have the power distribution lines already in place. However even along 80 you’ll see a few. They tend to be where high voltage distribution lines leave high demand urban areas, and the land gets cheap enough. A lot of other places just need some high tension power lines, and it will happen. Permitting for those is a nightmare.