Unfortunately, 6502 can't XOR the accumulator with itself. I don't recall if the Z80 can, and loading an immediate 0 would be most efficient on those anyway.

▲ blywi 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

XOR A absolutely works on Z80 and it's of course faster and shorter than loading a zero value with LD A,0. LD A,0 is encoded to 2 bytes while XOR A is encoded as a single opcode. XOR A has the additional benefit to also clear all the flags to 0. Sub A will clear the accumulator, but it will always set the N flag on Z80.

	▲	eichin 15 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yeah, the article seems to have missed the likely biggest reason that this is the popular x86 idiom - that it was already the popular 8080/Z80 idiom from the CP/M era, and there's a direct line (and a bunch of early 8086 DOS applications were mechanically translated assembly code, so while they are "different" architectures they're still solidly related.)
	▲	classichasclass 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Ah, thanks, I couldn't recall off the top of my head.

▲ repelsteeltje 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You're absolutely right, I stand corrected.

The 6502 gets by doing immediate load: 2 clock cycles, 2 bytes (frequently followed by single byte register transfer instruction). Out of curiosity I did a quick scan of the MOS 1.20 rom of the BBC micro:

  LDY #0 (a0 00): 38 hits
  LDX #0 (a2 00): 28 hits
  LDA #0 (a9 00): 48 hits

▲ bonzini 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The Z80 can do either LD A,0 or SUB A or XOR A, but the LD is slower due to the extra memory cycle to load the second byte of the instruction.