> I find it interesting how in software, I repeatedly hear people saying "I should not have to learn, it should all be intuitive". In every other field, it is a given that experts are experts because they learned first.

Other fields don't have the same ability to produce unlimited incidental complexity, and therefore not the same need to rein it in. But I don't think there's any field which (as a whole) doesn't value simplicity.

I feel like it's missing my point. Using a chainsaw is harder than using a manual saw, but if you need to cut many trees it's a lot more efficient to first learn how to use the chainsaw.

Now if you take the chainsaw without spending a second thinking about learning to use it, and start using it like a manual saw... no doubt you will find it worse, but that's the wrong way to approach a chainsaw.

And I am not saying that async is "strictly better" than all the alternatives (in many situations the chainsaw is inferior to alternatives). I am saying that it is a tool. In some situations, I find it easier to express what I want with async. In others, I find alternatives better. At the end of the day, I am the professional choosing which tool I use for the job.