> so anyone interested can reproduce the results themselves.

Weird reasoning.

You already caught our attention with your article. But not everyone has the time or means to go and re-do the tests.

However such information is really important to surface when making infra decisions. And if one of the brain cells pops up and says something about 20-80% perf improvement VS there were some perf improvements - which would be more convincing to research the topic when the time comes for the reader to benefit from your research?