Remix.run Logo
whatsupdog 4 days ago

[flagged]

saaaaaam 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Someone who works on a “sugar dating” app advocating for synthetic child porn? That’s… uncomfortable?

throwanem 4 days ago | parent [-]

To say the least. Great catch! 'O brave new world, that has such people in 't.'

danso 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Has the availability of deepfake porn generation reduced the demand for deepfake porn featuring real people? When deepfake generators are capable of creating convincing imagery of flawless ideal fake humans, why do you suppose there’s so many real humans who report being non-consensual subjects of deepfake porn?

numpad0 4 days ago | parent [-]

> Has the availability of deepfake porn generation reduced the demand for deepfake porn featuring real people?

yes

> When deepfake generators are capable of creating convincing imagery of flawless ideal fake humans, why do you suppose there’s so many real humans who report being non-consensual subjects of deepfake porn?

?

eCa 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

One obvious argument is what it was trained on.

whatsupdog 4 days ago | parent [-]

Doesn't have to be. You can train it on normal pictures of children and nude images of adults.

throwanem 4 days ago | parent [-]

> Doesn't have to be. You can train it on normal pictures of children and nude images of adults.

You say this so casually, as though it were a normal thing to know, or as if a normal person would know it. Does that actually seem true where you live right now?

And how do you know that, anyway, Harsh? I mean, all those "unblocked" games you stole to give away and that you also put on Github, that's one thing. But this...

arowthway 4 days ago | parent [-]

Come on, it's not hard to come up with this idea. And it's not even true, model trained on clothed children and nude adults wouldn't know how children's genitals look like.

throwanem 4 days ago | parent [-]

[flagged]