| ▲ | FlamingMoe 7 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the docs, "It is strictly recommended for personal, non-production use." Wow what a 180 from just a year ago when their blog said, "For companies that handle sensitive information, deploying open-source scheduling software on-premises can offer an extra layer of security. Unlike cloud services controlled by external vendors, on-prem installations let teams maintain full ownership of their infrastructure. " ¹ I just cannot trust a company that does a bait and switch like this. ¹ https://cal.com/blog/open-source-scheduling-empower-your-tea... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Ethee 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think this is less a bait and switch and more just a legal liability shield. They're not saying you 'cant' use it that way. They just don't recommend you do, and they won't support you at all for doing so. Which I think is completely fair. Also, these two things aren't in contradiction. Deploying on prem does offer more security, but then it's up to you to use it correctly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sreekanth850 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I still remember when they launched here. "Opensource Alternate to Calendly" was their post title. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hrimfaxi 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[dead] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||