> Hardly a level-headed response, even if you disagree about the financial share of something

According to the linked responses, the keys were not deleted because of disagreement over financial share, but over how the keys were to be used (in particular, in potentially dangerous security-wise ways), for which he did not want personal responsibility over (the keys belonged and used by him even before that project)

▲

Avamander 3 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

ysnp 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Phantom Secure is directly named as one of the parties Donaldson was dealing with, with others being suspected:

>Donaldson tried to make a deal with Phantom Secure, which ultimately didnt work out. Micay suspected other counterparties were linked to organized crime, but we cannot confirm those identities or ties on short notice. Donaldson began pursuing such deals before Micay left and continued afterward.

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/34369-original-grapheneos-r...

▲

HybridStatAnim8 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The claims arent vague, they are quite specific in what happened. This wasnt spiteful and this wasnt disgruntled. It was the logical choice given the circumstances.

	▲	Avamander an hour ago \| parent [-]
		[flagged]