| ▲ | highfrequency 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Why do you prefer the laptop to be thicker and heavier? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | petu 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Nobody said that. MacBooks of that period made compromises for useless gain in thinness. You can't with straight face tell that butterfly mechanism was a good tradeoff for .3 mm. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | et-al 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Luckily there are two lines: the Air and the Pro. The issue people had was from 2016-2019, the Macbook Pros sacrificed a lot of usability for thinness, when that should only happen for the Airs. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jonhohle 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think the preference is to have a battery that can run a CPU that's compiling, AI-ing, or rendering for an entire day (16+ hours) without having to worry about where an outlet is or being tethered to a wall or be thermal throttled. Right now that's a volume tradeoff. If there was something that ran as fast for as long and was MacBook Air (or the last Intel generation) thin, I don't think anyone would complain. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | eloisant 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'd be fine with a thinner and lighter laptop if it was without compromises. But having a shitty keyboard, losing the HDMI port, wasn't worth it. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | soperj 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
My old thinkpad was thicker but not heavier. Way more ports, didn't need dongles. | |||||||||||||||||