Likewise he can probably defer his Social Security payments until 70, in order to get the higher benefit...

+1 for Medicare for the non-rich, though. I'm a retiree and the monthly payment is about 1/4 of what I was paying for health insurance before I was eligible.

▲

PopAlongKid 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> the monthly payment is about 1/4 of what I was paying for health insurance before I was eligible.

Maybe not, if you take into account the >$500/month subsidy of your Medicare Part A benefits (assuming you had the minimum number of calendar quarters paid in). And your Part B payment (the one usually deducted from your Soc Sec payment) is also partly subsidized unless your income is high enough to trigger IRMAA adjustment.

▲

reducesuffering 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> defer his Social Security payments until 70, in order to get the higher benefit

People repeat this but when I ran the math on earlier Social Security payments it seems like the accrued $, by the time you're eligible for the higher benefit, is plenty similar as bonus income.

	▲	aworks 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I'm not following this advice for now but a recent post about not delaying https://nesteggcare.com/why-would-you-delay-the-start-of-soc...
	▲	PopAlongKid 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		It also helps to spread your lifetime Soc Sec benefits over more tax years, thereby lowering the total tax you pay (because pushing higher payouts into fewer tax years by delayed filing will typically increase your marginal tax bracket).
	▲	rootusrootus 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yeah it's definitely not one-size-fits-all advice. Depending on what your IRA/401k situation looks like, taking SS right at 62 may be the financially superior choice as it reduces your early draw down on the investments.

▲

lateforwork 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

But is Medicare as good as the insurance you had before?

▲

BugsJustFindMe 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I can't speak for aworks, but most of the people I've spoken to on it, like my mother, say it's better than the private insurance they had before.

▲

lokar 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’m going to need to buy on the individual market. Talking to a broker he said Medicare is a great deal, and you should take it if you can.

▲

aworks 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

For general medical coverage, it was better for my Mom and now it seems better for me. Some things are not covered with traditional Medicare e.g. dental and vision.

▲

BugsJustFindMe 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Dental and vision aren't covered by private medical insurance either, and private dental insurance typically has max annual payouts low enough (like $1k/1.5k) to make it basically a scam unless you know you'll actually get use out of it.

	▲	aworks an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I had a separate dental insurance policy but as you suggest, it didn't make much sense and I dropped it. So yes, dental/vision was a wash versus private medical insurance. There are some other therapies I no longer have any coverage for under Medicare.

▲

Exoristos 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A lot depends one what you do for Part C (if you do).