|
| ▲ | Someone 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I think a major difference is that Apple doesn’t see factories purely as stores where you buy the stuff they advertise they can make; it cooperates with manufacturers to get them to build things that they couldn’t make before. They are willing to pay billions up front to get production lines built to their specifications and guarantee that they will buy X products over Y time, in exchange for exclusivity. For example, when Apple decided they wanted to use CNC aluminum milling to build laptop frames, no factory could do that at their scale and desired precision. And yes, you can only do that if you have lots of cash flowing around, but that’s not sufficient. You also need a process that gives you a very good chance that such investments pay out. |
| |
| ▲ | bigyabai 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Apple doesn’t see factories purely as stores At Apple's scale, you basically can't operate like this. Placing an order for 50 million iPhone screens is not a consumer-grade request, you have to customize and coordinate your orders to get all 50 million delivered. It's hard to see the genius in this, the advantages you've listed are all courtesy of scale and liquidity. | | |
| ▲ | geodel 18 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Huh, courtesy of scale is because of 50 million customers were convinced that iPhone has quality enough to pay premium over 100s of other phone models. No one is stopping Dell, Acer, Asus, Samsung etc of the world to put order of 50 million widgets and get best quality at cut throat price. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | zemvpferreira 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I would earnestly suggest reading Apple In China: https://www.amazon.com/Apple-China-Capture-Greatest-Company/... It both captures Tim's genius and the genius of the person much geniuser than him: Xi Jinping. |
|
| ▲ | momojo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I bet it's more about what he didn't do. Like how a stable marriage seems boring but is the accumulation of many many right (by necessarily genius) decisions. |
|
| ▲ | motoxpro 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I mean sounds like you are asking the question "What is the job of a CEO?" |
| |
| ▲ | doitLP 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not really. I’m asking why he’s a genius. When I was told that WW2 wouldnt have gone the same without George C Marshall or how amazing Teddy Roosevelt was at getting stuff done, I went and read their bios and now I understand. Cook does things different than other CEOs apparently so what are those? Other have recommended Apple In China so I’ll start there! |
|
|
| ▲ | shafoshaf 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I think this is a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_man_theory fallacy. There is a correlation to Cook and the performance, but the idea that this was all because of one single guy at the top is survivor bias. For example, other companies didn't fail at outsourcing to China because their CEOs weren't as personally involved as Cook, it was because the team as a whole didn't perform. Looking today, Trump is as much a symptom as the problem. He didn't get there just because of who he is, he rode on the backs of all the people who voted for him, the state legislators who gerrymandered for him, the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, etc... |
