It depends. We have pretty good review culture (usually same day rarely more than 24H), but some changes may need multiple rounds of review or might be have flaky tests that uncovers after a few hours. Also some work is experimental and not ready for pushing out for review. Sometimes I create a very large number of commits as part of a migration DND I can't get them all reviewed in parallel. It can be a lot of things. Maybe it happens more with monorepos.

▲

SOLAR_FIELDS 2 days ago | parent [-]

All fair points, indeed I face each of the challenges you listed periodically myself. But it's never been often enough to feel like I need to seek out an entirely different toolchain and approach to manage them.

▲

dwb 2 days ago | parent [-]

Well, fortunately Jujutsu isn’t an entirely different toolchain and/or approach. It’s one tool that’s git-compatible and is quite similar to it. But where it’s different, it’s (for me) better.

▲

seba_dos1 2 days ago | parent [-]

Yeah, I've never used Jujutsu, but from what I've seen so far everything it does can be done with Git itself, just perhaps in a (sometimes significantly) less convenient way.

	▲	dwb 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Sure, true, I would say "often significantly" though, to the extent that you would never bother doing half the things with git that you can do with Jujutsu because it's such a pain.