| ▲ | quicksnap 2 days ago | |
From practical experience from using jj daily and having (disposable) mega merges: When I have discrete, separate units of work, but some may not merge soon (or ever), being able to use mega merges is so amazing. For example, I have some branch that has an experimental mock-data-pipeline thingy. I have yet to devote the time to convince my colleagues to merge it. But I use it. Meanwhile, I could be working on two distinct things that can merge separately, but I would like to use Thing A while also testing Thing B, but ALSO have my experimental things merged in. Simply run `jj new A B C`. Now I have it all. Because jj's conflict resolution is fundamentally better, and rebases are painless, this workflow is natural and simple to use as a tool | ||
| ▲ | adrianmsmith 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
> Because jj's conflict resolution is fundamentally better I don't know jj well so its merge algorithm may well be better in some aspects but it currently can't merge changes to a file in one branch with that file being renamed in another branch. Git can do that. | ||