the irritating thing about LLM generated papers like these is that they're wrong but are generated using LLMs that are capable enough to bury the absurd claim pretty deep in there.

▲

stingraycharles 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Analyze it using an LLM. Claude was pretty ruthless about this one.

▲

thethirdone 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, for me Claude identified the phrase "this holds with probability 1 over random weight matrices since the null space has dimension"

Treating trained weights as random for the purpose of a proof is immediately discrediting for a paper to me.

	▲	EGreg 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		"This holds for almost all matrices" is actually something you'd want to know if we're talking about probabilities, no?

▲

gaze 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

sure but it seems spiritually wrong to use an LLM to debug a slop paper. Who knows, maybe claude generated it in the first place?

▲

Hard_Space 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

In fairness, real-world researchers are expert at selective emphasis too.