Semi off-topic, but does anyone know of good resources for jj that don't assume git knowledge? Steve's and others are high quality, but often things are explained in terms of git equivalents or describe workflows that I struggle to fully understand the purpose of, as someone who knows only the barest basics of git necessary to work on personal projects.

If none exist, I think there's a great opportunity there, for anyone with the knowledge and motivation to make some absolute beginner guides. Already jj is infinitely more user-friendly, and as the tool matures, it isn't far fetched to think a new generation of programmers could go straight to jj without knowing their way around git first.

▲

incognito124 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

There's https://jj-for-everyone.github.io/

	▲	ksymph 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		> This is a tutorial for the Jujutsu version control system. It requires no previous experience with Git or any other version control system. > At the time of writing, most Jujutsu tutorials are targeted at experienced Git users, teaching them how to transfer their existing Git skills over to Jujutsu. This tutorial is my attempt to fill the void of beginner learning material for Jujutsu. Exactly what I was looking for, thank you!

▲

quicksnap 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm not immediately aware. There's a certain amount of git-ness embedded in it with it being a DAG, having commits, and being compatible with git remotes. And, since the industry still runs on git, most people will need to learn it somewhat, anyway.

▲

dbt00 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Honestly, until JJ is 1.0, I wouldn't recommend it for beginners. There's significant changes happening to the interface still.

▲

maleldil 2 days ago | parent [-]

I've been using it in relatively the same way for a while now. The only meaningful changes were native support for `tug` and `absorb`, neither of which significantly changed my workflow.

▲

dzaima 2 days ago | parent [-]

eh, there have been a good amount of breaking changes. `-d`/`--destination` → `-o`/`--onto` (the former isn't yet deprecated though); deprecated `--allow-new` on push (or, forcibly making it the default for `--bookmark`); deprecated `jj bookmark track foo@bar` (and `jj bookmark track foo` having a really-weird system (I personally just call it broken, even though the behavior is intentional) of sometimes tracking the bookmark on all remotes; really I'd call jj's entire system of bookmark tracking/pulling/pushing quite incomplete outside of the trivial cases); various changed revset functions over time that break configs; and a really-annoying thing of `jj git fetch` sometimes abandoning ascendants of `@` leaving you in a confusing state (if not one with conflicts), with the solution being a future `jj git sync`.

It's certainly very usable despite all that, and the changes are simple enough to adapt to, but it's a pretty new thing.

	▲	bombcar 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I think for a real neophyte jj will be fine especially when used with the git backend. Someone who "knows enough to be dangerous" may be better served by sticking with the git happy-path. Of course, if working with others you should use what they do until you're confident that you can switch without impacting them.