| ▲ | whynotmaybe 3 hours ago | |
> it's pretty old. Damn, must be why only white hair is growing on my head now. >Nowadays I think this would be done with fuzzing/constraint tests, where you define "this relation must hold true" in a more structured way so the framework can choose random values, test more at once, and give better failure messages. So the concept of random is still there but expressed differently ? (= Am I partially right ?) | ||