| ▲ | ttul 3 hours ago |
| Am I being paranoid in questioning whether the CPC would have something to gain by monitoring coding sessions with Chinese coding AI models? Coding models receive snippets of our intellectual property all day long. It's a bit of a gold mine, no? |
|
| ▲ | throwaw12 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I think you should worry more about NSA, FBI, ICE and other 3 letter US agencies monitoring your sessions |
| |
| ▲ | ttul 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There's nothing anyone can do about state-level espionage anywhere, using any cloud-hosted service. That being said, there is a very big difference between the legal situation in the United States vs. China. Chinese internet companies are required to have CPC interaction and since the rule of law does not strictly exist in China, the state can compel surveillance cooperation regardless of what might be written down. If a three-letter agency is compelling Anthropic to open up its queries for inspection, that kind of surveillance would be authorized by law and if Anthropic violated the law in cooperating, they would suffer the consequences in civil court. Maybe not immediately, but at least the possibility exists. In China, there's no recourse at all. Surveillance must be presumed. |
|
|
| ▲ | rockinghigh 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Are there any protections from industrial espionage when using Anthropic, Cursor, Gemini, or OpenAI? |
| |
| ▲ | DonsDiscountGas 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | There are legal protections, and those companies have more to lose by breaking those laws than following them. Same probably not true for Chinese companies. | | |
| ▲ | throwaw12 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Legal protection, only if you're a billionaire and US citizen, for everyone else there is no protection. Does US actually follow laws? They literally kidnapped head of another state and bombed another state and you are expecting legal protection from them? |
|
|