AI creation kills cultural sharing.

People who create AI music are largely not sharing it with others for any reason other than to create a revenue stream. They are also not consuming new AI music to be able to develop influences and synthesize new ideas. The system builds brick walls where there was once osmosis.

How can art evolve under these conditions?

▲

1234letshaveatw 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Why are some crafts more sacred than others?

	▲	array_key_first 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Because some crafts are more sacred than others. Making a painting is more sacred than smearing my shit in the Barns and Nobel bathroom stall, although arguably less fun. Who decides that? We do, collectively. Why do we have that power? Because we define art. Why do only humans have this power? Because art is an innately human thing, so we get to decide.
	▲	UncleMeat 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I don't know what you mean by this. The same effect can be felt in other forms of art.

▲

charcircuit 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>They are also not consuming new AI music to be able to develop influences and synthesize new ideas.

If not they most definitely are listening to other music that influences them. If you have proof that such a producer listens to 0 music feel free to share it.