maybe they decided OpenAI has different market, hence comparing only with companies who are focusing in dev tooling: Claude, GLM

▲

edwinjm 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Haven’t you heard about Codex?

▲

throwaw12 9 hours ago | parent [-]

its an SKU from OpenAI's perspective, broader goal and vision is (was) different. Look at the Claude and GLM, both were 95% committed to dev tooling: best coding models, coding harness, even their cowork is built on top of claude code

▲

zozbot234 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not sure how this makes sense when Claude models aren't even coding specific: Haiku, Sonnet, Opus are the exact same models you'd use for chat or (with the recent Mythos) bleeding edge research.

▲

throwaw12 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Anthropic models and training data is optimized for coding use cases, this is the difference.

OpenAI on the other hand has different models optimized for coding, GPT-x-codex, Anthropic doesnt have this distinction

	▲	pixel_popping 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		But they detect it under the hood and apply a similar "variant", as API results are not the same than on Claude Code (that was documented before by someone).