> The government is the one that said it didn't want/couldn't use this

Technically, the Pentagon did. I don’t know if that’s legally binding on the NSA.

tren_hard an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I work for a completely unrelated fed agency, who doesn’t use Anthropic products, and we all received the email stating we couldn’t use them period.

	▲	JumpCrisscross 33 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Huh, does supply-chain risk mean SecDef can bar a company from all federal contracting?

▲

jeremyjh 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

TFA says the NSA is part of the DOD.

▲

rsfern 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It is, but NSA reports to the director of national intelligence, not the defense secretary, so it’s unclear (to me at least) that SecDef’s opinion of Anthropic counts for anything here

I guess DOD is large enough they have multiple parallel cabinet level positions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency

▲

derektank 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It’s not as clear as that. The NSA director is also, traditionally, dual-hatted as the Commander of CYBERCOM and thus a flag officer reporting ultimately to the SecDef. The DNI is responsible for coordinating/funding national intelligence activities but ultimately a lot of day to day operational decision making tends to flow through the pentagon. They would definitely need to abide by DoD policy

	▲	JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> They would definitely need to abide by DoD policy The policy in question is a statement by SecDef being reviewed by courts. I think it’s fair to ask whether DNI is actually constrained by that, or if it’s a judgement call.