| ▲ | huswepcc 2 hours ago | |
Passing on what an ancient greybread told me. He said look at it as a Noisy system (signal is always lower than noise no matter what you do) with bounded chimps inside it. Bounded meaning there are upper limits to what anyone can do. And there are upper limits to how frequently model updates of the chimp brain can happen per unit time. And the limits of a group are much lower. At the extreme end Large institutions once they settle on a model of reality can take decades to radically update it. Even if all signs say reality has totally changed. So with those constraints in mind decide what you want to spend your energy and time on. | ||
| ▲ | apsurd an hour ago | parent [-] | |
Sounds like innovator's dilemma + a quote i saw recently: Former UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher: “Consensus ... is the process of avoiding the very issues that have to be solved.” I buy that inevitably the system becomes it's own constraint and local optimum. But working together is a practical reality too. Worth making the best of. | ||