| ▲ | adammarples 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incredibly easy to explain this without trying hard. The subject has some sense of movement forwards, and the brain rationalises it, like we do in dreams, imagining a tunnel or a canoe or whatever familiar thing is associated with that feeling of drifting or flying. So we can conclude that maybe near death experiences cause a feeling of falling or drifting, and is a bit like dreaming - not that objective reality should be rejected. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | BoardsOfCanada 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We're talking past each other. The problem isn't coming up with a hypothesis of why experiences differ according to experiences. Start by explaining how there can be any experience at all after an hour without oxygen to the brain. But after that we come to a stage where experiences differ so much that they aren't reconcilable in one objective reality and that's what I tried to address. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||