Very nice developer experience. A lot of batteries included, like CDN, incremental page regeneration, image pipeline or observability. Not having to maintain a server.

I’m still planning to move elsewhere though, the vendor lock-in is not worth it and I’d like to keep our infra in the EU.

▲

tucnak 2 hours ago | parent [-]

All of this is available in Cloudflare $5 plan?

▲

dandaka 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Every three months I'm trying to deploy to Cloudflare from Monorepo and I hadn't have success yet. While Vercel works every time from the box. Maybe I could dig deeper and try to understand how it works, but I'm super lazy to do that.

▲

rs_rs_rs_rs_rs 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In my experience it severely lacks on developer experience, compared to Vercel.

▲

fontain 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Cloudflare’s developer experience doesn’t come close, it is terrible. Cloudflare are working on it, and hopefully they’ll be a real competitor to Vercel on ease of use someday, but right now, it is painful when compared to Vercel. Cloudflare is infrastructure first, Vercel is developer experience first.

▲

Onavo an hour ago | parent [-]

Yes, CloudFlare's full of bugs and sharp edges. Not to mention the atrocious 3MB worker size limit (especially egregious in the age of ML models). They don't mention this up front in the docs and the moment you try to deploy anything non trivial it's oops time to completely re architect your app.

	▲	kentonv 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> Not to mention the atrocious 3MB worker size limit That's for the free plan. Limits are documented here: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/platform/limits/#w...