> In most of the world such photos would be deemed of public interest

You'd absolutely get detained by authorities in Ukraine or Russia for sharing consequences of airstrikes on critical infrastructure. I'm sure other countries would do the same (not that it's good).

▲

traceroute66 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well, in Russia you would most likely accidentally fall out of the window that a careless person left open.

▲

konart an hour ago | parent [-]

You can open Telegram and watch at videos and photos of almost any Ukrainian strike.

	▲	alephnerd 43 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		A large number of those tend to be vetted. Additonally, frontlines level videos do go through significant vetting and some form of MDM is used on personal phones in the frontlines. Additionally, on the Ukraine side as well as the Russian side, civilian strike information isn't deemed critical from a NatSec perspective as plenty of Russians and Ukrainians lived on both sides of the border and still have relatives on either side, so both assume the other has granular level knowledge of non-frontline spaces.

▲

dylan604 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

obviously, countries have ways to determine BDAs for their attacks, but you don't have to give it to them for free. The concept of oversharing is lost in the age of social media.