| ▲ | djmips 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wow it feels like the Loebner prize went away right at the dawn of the LLM. Is it correlated? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | vunderba 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yeah I definitely think LLMs contributed to its demise. To be honest, nobody in academic AI circles took it very seriously, because it kind of devolved into a contest over who could create the most convincing illusion of intelligence. Participants spent more time polishing up the natural language parsing aspects in conjunction with pre‑programming elaborate backstories for their chatbot's bios among other psychological tricks. In the end, the whole competition was more impressive as a social engineering exercise, since the real goal kinda became: how can I trick people into thinking my chatbot is a human? But reading through some of the previous competition chatbot transcripts still makes for fascinating reading. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||