| ▲ | epistasis 4 hours ago | |||||||
Anybody else having problem getting Opus 4.7 to write code? I had it pick up a month-old project, some small one off scripts that I want to modify, and it refused to even touch the code. So far it costs a lot less, because I'm not going to be using it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | GeoAtreides 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> it refused to even touch the code. ??? please i beg post the prompt and the refusal I literally can not imagine a model refusing to do something | ||||||||
| ▲ | apelapan 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
On the contrary, I threw a multi-threading optimization task on it, that 4.5 and 4.6 have been pretty useless at handling. 4.7 bested my hand-tuned solution by almost 2x on first attempt. This was what I thought was my best moat as a senior dev. No other model has been able to come close to the throughput I could achieve on my own before. Might be a fluke of course, and they've picked up a few patterns in training that applies to this particular problem and doesn't generalize. We'll see. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||
| ▲ | mrtesthah 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
No, see, we have to leave writing code to fully identity-verified individuals working on behalf of only the largest institutions now because what if they decided to write malware? | ||||||||