Given the size of some of these data centers, the incentives packages that local governments often give their developers, and the impact on the electric grid that can, in some cases, raise costs for other ratepayers, I'd say the comparison could be similar.

The one Google's putting in KC North is 500 acres [0] and there were $10 billion in taxable revenue bonds put up by the Port Authority to help with the cost.

This for a company that could pay for that in cash right now.

[0] https://fox4kc.com/news/google-confirms-its-behind-new-data-...

▲

jeffbee 8 hours ago | parent [-]

That's the opposite of a subsidy. KC stakes nothing of value and gets a defined revenue for the next 25 years.

	▲	lenerdenator 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Then why would Google mess with the bonds at all? Again, they have the cash to buy that land and develop it without any further consideration beyond permits and planning.