It’s not really, companies like GM used to boast about how well they treated their employees and communities. It was Jack Welch and a legion of like-minded arseholes who decided they should be increasingly richer no matter who or what paid for it.

▲

axpy906 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It’s funny how corporations get a bar wrap. Have you ever worked with private equity? Bad to worse.

▲

dboreham 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

See also HP. Pretty much only Costco left.

	▲	chrisweekly 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		This is where PBCs (Public Benefit Companies) and B-Corps may have a role to play. Something like that seems necessary to enable both (A) sufficient profitability to support innovation and viability in a capitalist society and (B) consideration of the public good. Traditional public companies aren't just disincentivized from caring about externalities, they're legally required to maximize shareholder profits, full stop. Which IMHO is a big part of the reason companies ~always become "evil".
	▲	devmor 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Costco is such a strange and stark case standing in opposition to this general rule. From everything I hear, I can only gather that the reason is because of extremely experienced and level-headed executive staff.

▲

tehjoker 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The previous deal was due to (a) a lower level of development of capitalism (b) a higher profit margin that collapsed in the 70s (c) a communist movement that threatened capital into behaving

	▲	ShroudedNight 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		"Is your washroom breeding Bolsheviks?"

▲

renticulous 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Middle class productive population produces commons goods and resources which gets exploited by Elites. Tragedy of the Commons applied to wealth generation process itself.