> Of course, there is indeed no shame. There is also no pride.

But there's is "pride" in making tools people actually use without issue

Thanemate 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

True, but why would people use yet another lookalike tool over the one they're currently using? Or is the implication that looks don't matter as long as it works? Because if that's the case, Why do we need CSS?

	▲	prmph 4 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		the beauty is in the consistency. why do we build with right angles, straight lines, regular curves, etc? Why not random angles, crooked lines, etc for style and "excitement"? Why don't we assemble a furniture set from a random assortment of pieces from flea markets? People sense that that is ugly.

▲

lwhi 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

But it's possible to have usability and a unique design character, if you use a human designer.