Remix.run Logo
microtonal 2 hours ago

The compliance model is very simple. Do not collect data. Problem solved. If you need to collect data (e.g. because you are a webshop), only collect the minimum necessary.

The problem is not the GDPR, the problem is the surveillance industry that wants to grab as much data as possible and try to do as much malicious compliance as possible.

jandrewrogers 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Designing around GDPR compliance shows up all over the place in industrial data collection. It doesn't only affect surveillance webslop.

The costs are often worse on industrial side because the data is so much larger and faster than web or mobile data.

gwerbin an hour ago | parent [-]

What do you mean by "industrial" in this case?

jandrewrogers 32 minutes ago | parent [-]

Telemetry from machines and data from environmental sensors that is collected for operational purposes (safety, efficiency, reliability) in industrial applications. Old school engineering systems that in modern times have expansive network-connected sensors that may even have onboard classifiers to reduce the quantity of data.

The trouble started when lawyers correctly noticed that these are incidentally capable surveillance systems even though that isn't how we use them or what they were designed for.