There's now an entire cottage industry that is based attempted take-downs or refutations of claims made by AI providers. Lots of people and companies are trying to make a name for themselves, and others are motivated by partisan bias (e.g. they prefer OpenAI models) or just anti-LLM bias. It's wild.

I don't think it's anti-LLM bias--or, if it is, it's ironic, because this post smells a lot like it was written by one.

(BTW, I don't necessarily think LLMs helping to write is a bad thing, in and of itself. It's when you don't validate its output and transform it into your own voice that it's a problem.)

I call it a pro-human bias, personally.

Great, it can compete with the cottage industry dedicated solely to hyping and exaggerating AI performance.