Remix.run Logo
faangguyindia 3 hours ago

If you forget to autoclave them or not done properly you end up with infected patients, risk is just too much

jjk166 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We sterilize plenty of other common tools like scalpels so that doesn't seem like a valid reason. Obviously the disposable design is not even an adequate solution to the risk of cross contamination. I would imagine if it were a real concern you could easily add something like a color changing strip that would indicate whether the needle has been autoclaved since its last use without rendering it useless.

seb1204 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sounds like the same risk as this situation of reusing them.

kube-system 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Well if you’re going to infect people, might as well save money while doing so :)

NDlurker 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Prions aren't destroyed by autoclave

Marsymars 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They can "survive" autoclave cycles that render other pathogens dead/inactive, but there do exist autoclave cycles that seem to pretty reliably inactivate prions.

Loughla 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

No but viruses and bacteria are. What's your point and how common is transmitting prions?

NDlurker 2 hours ago | parent [-]

My point is disposable is superior