I mean look at the result where he asked about a unicycle - the model couldn't even keep the spokes inside the wheels - would be rudimentary if it "learned" what it means to draw a bicycle wheel and could transfer that to unicycle.

▲

duzer65657 5 hours ago | parent [-]

it's the frame that's surprisingly - and consistentnly - wrong. You'd think two triangles would be pretty easy to repro; once you get that the rest is easy. It's not like he's asking "draw a pelican on a four-bar linkage suspension mountainbike..."

▲

Reddit_MLP2 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is older, but even humans don't have a great concept of how a bicycle works... https://twistedsifter.com/2016/04/artist-asks-people-to-draw...

	▲	yndoendo 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Wouldn't this be more about being capable of mentally remembering how a bicycle looks versus how it works? This reminds me of Pictionary. [0] Some people are good and some are really bad. I am really bad a remembering how items look in my head and fail at drawing in Pictionary. My drawing skills are tied to being able to copy what I see. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pictionary

▲

quinnjh 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

is it possible to have greater success with the specificity? I don't think i ever drew a bike frame properly as a kid despite riding them and understanding the concept of spokes and wheels...