| |
| ▲ | chungusamongus 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | What you just said was an elaborate tu quoque fallacy. You aren't comprehending my basic point, which is that individual ethical decisions are not going to make a difference when all of the broader incentives are causing people to act otherwise. | | |
| ▲ | EinigeKreise 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The idea behind principles is that you're supposed to stick to them anyways. | | |
| ▲ | chungusamongus 4 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Lets put aside the fact that none of you have coherently outlined what supposed principles are relevent here. The thing worth noting is, the argument presented in the article seems to be consequentialist, and I'm saying it will fail to produce the consequences the author supposedly wants. |
| |
| ▲ | dilDDoS 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Really weird that you're basically advocating people to not have principles if they don't align with "broader incentives". Also lol at you pulling the "some people have kids to feed" bullshit in a thread where we're all making way more money than most people. | | |
| ▲ | chungusamongus 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think some of you do not have a grasp on systems thinking at all, and its embarassing for people who supposedly frequent communities like these. I'm not advocating anything. I'm making a descriptive statement. I do worry that basic lack of understanding between descriptive and normative claims is contributing to the confusion here. | | |
| ▲ | throwanem 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's rich out of somebody who obviously has no concept of signaling theory. Not to mention, of course, that "systems thinking" makes no comment on human ethics or morality. Unlike some, the people working in the field seem generally to know their limits. But you're right that clarity is important. In that spirit, it was your cowardly effort to excuse your behavior, and your obviously motivated effort to ameliorate its moral odium which you feel, that I criticized. This was and is in the course of helping you fully grasp that whatever is driving you, here, feels unconscionable to you because it is unconscionable and you know it, just as you understand in your heart that there is no excuse. Else you would not strive so here, in the hope someone else may supply what you failed to achieve alone. I don't know just what it is that you're feeling so exercised with guilt over. Nor do I care. You know. For the rest of us, I confide, it will eventually become part of the public record, and I'm happy to wait that day without further unprompted comment here. |
| |
| ▲ | throwanem 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I know lots of families who feed their kids just fine on something less than a quarter million US a year. Just about all the families I know with kids, these days. | | |
| ▲ | chungusamongus 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | If we want to get into anecdotes... most of the people I know with kids are seriously struggling. And that aligns more closely with economic data than what you said. Most people do not have a robust emergency fund at all. | | |
| ▲ | throwanem 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I understand why you would rather "get into anecdotes" than answer my point. I don't understand why you keep posting, save perhaps that "the guilty flee where no man pursueth." The account you're using is without history or reputation. All you have to do to make this end is stop. | | |
| ▲ | chungusamongus 5 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I did address your point by directly refuting it, and you responded with a total non sequitur. Are you okay buddy? I'm making a relatively basic argument about the ability of households to make ends meet and you're quoting bible passages, looking into my account history, and making random accusations. The guilty flee where none pursueth? You're literally attempting to prosecute me, lmao. But please, "pursueth" away. You are the one who looks a little weird in this scenario. I made my account today because I wanted to comment on this article and I didn't have an account previously. Is that a crime? Are you going to report me to the thought police? Lmao some of the people on here are a little intense. Maybe take some deep breaths and realize I'm not trying to harm you. I wish you the best. I just disagree with the way you think on this particular issue. | | |
| ▲ | throwanem a minute ago | parent [-] | | It's remarkable to me that you should be so concerned with my perspective, if you believe me insane as you claim. Evidently you are concerned with my perspective, considering the effort you keep going to to continue to gain its benefit. I've explained why I think that is, and I'm not likely to change my mind at this point. So why keep trying to negotiate it? |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | throwanem 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you keep telling yourself that, do you think it will eventually help you sleep at night? |
|
|