Understood.

1. Can we agree that this kind of corporate tradition does in fact exist at Google?

2. Can we agree that Google has a history of treating projects this way?

Repeatedly posing questions prefaced with “Can we agree...” comes across as a bit too much like cross-examination, and the guidelines specifically ask us not to cross-examine.

It doesn't matter if a snarky dismissal has some basis in reality; after all, pretty much every snarky dismissal does. The point is we don't want HN to be a snarky place. You're welcome to raise the topic of Google's corporate traditions in a curious, conversational style, just like anything else.

	▲	egorfine 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Got it and I appreciate the feedback! This comment was not meant to sound snarky (while the original one in fact was - am guilty). Sometimes it feels like polite comment will go nowhere while being blunt may convey a more focused message. Not in this case though, I agree.