> There are still protections and mitigations that targets can do, but those things require humans.

You claimed that there are certain protections and mitigations (i.e. defence moves) which require humans (ergo humans do these things better than AI, necessitating an AI+human team).

But you've still avoided expanding on what they might be, preferring instead to make petty remarks about my imaginative abilities.

> You claimed that there are certain protections and mitigations (i.e. defence moves) which require humans (ergo humans do these things better than AI, necessitating an AI+human team).

Right, but I did not make the claim that humans are better than AIs.