Remix.run Logo
babypuncher 5 hours ago

"Intellectual property" is a hack we put together to make capitalism properly assign value to abstract ideas that we all agree have value, but are inherently devalued by free market forces.

Capitalism by itself is incapable of valuing art and ideas beyond the marginal cost of producing duplicates, which has been on a steady downward trend since the invention of the printing press.

Our economy is increasingly reliant on a class of product that is fundamentally incompatible with how capitalism works. Maybe rather than adding to the centuries old hack that is clearly falling apart, we need to rethink things from the ground up.

lacy_tinpot 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What an incredible shallow reading of "capitalism".

Capitalism doesn't "assign value" to anything. It can't assign value to anything.

The value of something is determined only by a transaction. It's not assigned.

The value of something is made apparent only after an exchanged is made. Otherwise there is no "inherent" or "assigned" value to anything. The value is made explicit only after a transaction is made.

Abstract ideas don't really have value. Silicon Valley/Tech, which is perhaps the most ardent and exemplary capitalist industries today, does not assign value to abstract ideas. It assigns value to execution/tangible action.

Dylan16807 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Their point is that market forces push the value down to the marginal cost of copying.

This complaint about "determining" versus "assigning" value is not important. And copyright does follow execution, not the abstract idea.