Not just insider information, but insider access. If the outcome of some prop bet is under the control of a handful of people, those people can trivially conspire to produce whatever outcome is most profitable to them.

▲

tptacek 2 hours ago | parent [-]

If the outcome of a prop bet really is fully controlled by insiders, so that those insiders are making decisions based on betting outcomes, then allowing that betting to occur seems antisocial and counterproductive to begin with. This is another problem with the Polymarket/Kalshi species of "prediction market".

	▲	AnthonyMouse 24 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The problem is it's pretty hard to tell ahead of time whether that's what happens. Suppose some large private company has to decide whether they're going to build a new facility in city A or city B. This is useful information for all kinds of reasons. If you're a vendor then you need to start making preparations to set up shop in the city where your big customer is moving etc. The company's analysis shows it would derive a $10M advantage from building in city A. The prediction market is correctly leaning that way. If there are only enough counterparties that someone who now bets on city B and wins would make $5M, everything works the way it should and the company goes with city A. But if there are enough counterparties that a winning bet on city B would net you $25M then the company can place the bet, eat the $10M loss by choosing city B and come out $15M ahead. But the $10M number isn't public. It's essentially the thing you wanted the market to predict and it could be arbitrarily larger or smaller than that. So how are you supposed to know if the prediction market will be predicting the result or determining it?
	▲	wutwutwat an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> This is another problem It is insider trading, the thing everyone here is talking about