new | show | ask | jobs Github

bpt3 9 hours ago

By whom? The regulators are the ones signing up for these services.

▲

superfrank 9 hours ago | parent [-]

The FBI. This sounds like a CJIS violation

▲

tclancy 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Buddy, I have some awful news. On the plus side, you can email the FBI director at his personal email to try to get him on the case.

▲

superfrank 8 hours ago | parent [-]

You're being snide, but I have first hand experience in this area. If random Flock employees can just pull up production data on a whim without being properly vetted, agencies, states, and the FBI will take this pretty seriously.

They don't take it seriously because of some moral, "We care about your privacy" stance. They take it seriously because if there's something that makes them look bad in there, they want to be able to control the narrative. If a Flock camera catches and officer doing something they shouldn't be doing, the agency/FBI doesn't want a disgruntled Flock employee to be able to sign in and grab that video and give it to the news.

	▲	bpt3 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		What does the FBI have to do with video streams at a JCC? And isn't flock doing the vetting? This sounds a lot like BD guys doing demos with random data from a customer that agreed to show allow access and a local citizen getting very bent out of shape about it.