| ▲ | collabs 8 hours ago | |
To play the devil's advocate, if we do this, your favorite artist will get paid less if you listen to others using Spotify radio shuffle feature vs if you stay on the artist page and only listen to that one artist? The road to hell is paved with good intentions. | ||
| ▲ | AlecSchueler 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
If you listen to the artist less then they will receive less of your money. What's the issue you're seeing there? | ||
| ▲ | arnvald 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Well, if I listen to a shuffle radio then the artists I listen to will get paid, right? Which I’m fine with, it’s not that I want to support one specific artist (I can buy their album or merch if that’s my goal), I just want the money I pay to go to artists I listen to, not to the people from top charts that I don’t care about | ||
| ▲ | rcxdude 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
That sounds like the intended effect. I think the objection is that the user's payment is being diluted by all the other listeners. Someone who listens to spotify constantly is going to influence the payouts much more than someone who listens to it occasionally, even though they are paying the same amount to spotify and the latter user might have only subscribed to listen to one band. | ||
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | QuercusMax 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
How bout this: artists whose songs are played on shuffle only get a small percentage compared to those who users play on purpose. | ||