I think this is exactly the hard part: individual virtue alone does not solve a system where supervisors, trainees, and funders are all pulled by the same incentives. "Do slower, better science" is not actionable unless the surrounding infrastructure and rewards change too. That is a big part of what we're thinking about with Liberata, especially around peer review and attribution. If relevant, our beta waitlist is open: https://liberata.info/beta-signup

Seems interesting! I think there is a unit missing when asking "when do you anticipate to publish next".. I'm assuming months but would be important to specify

A) How does just another journal solves the main problem, that evaluation is done just counting the amount of papers. Are you giving grants that support a long time between publications?

B) You posted almost the same comment with a link to your project 8 times.