Exactly. I respect their decision to go closed source if that's what they need to do to make it a viable business, but just be honest about it. Don't make up some excuse around security and open source.

▲

bearsyankees 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't know if I fully agree with this -- how many people were actually self-hosting cal infra? I def could be wrong though

	▲	sixhobbits 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		it's not necessarily about people self hosting it, it's about people preferring to pay for hosted stuff that is open source (e.g. I pay for Plausible). Now it's a lot easier to rewrite open source stuff to get around licensing requirements and have an LLM watch the repo and copy all improvements and fixes, so the bar for a competitor to come along and get 10 years of work for free it a lot lower.
	▲	pembrook 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The issue isn’t would-be customers going to the trouble of self hosting to save a measly $30/month. The issue is competitors popping up to clone your offering with your own codebase.

▲

renewiltord 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]