LLMs really are stunningly good at finding vulnerabilities in code, which is why, with closed-source code, you can and probably will use them to make your code as secure as possible.

But you won't keep the doors open for others to use them against it.

So it is, unfortunately, understandable in a way...

▲

paprikanotfound 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not a security expert but can't close source applications be vulnerable and exploited too? I feel like using close source as a defense is just giving you a false sense of security.

▲

layer8 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Finding a vulnerability in a black box is drastically different from finding one in a white box. This isn’t about whether there is a vulnerability or not, but about the likelihood of it being found.

▲

ygjb 3 days ago | parent [-]

No it isn't. There is a tooling gap, and there is a skill gap, but both of those are being rapidly closed by both open and closed source projects.

LLMs, and tools built to use them, are violating a lot of assumptions these days.

	▲	thombles 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		It's a meaningful difference for SaaS. Most likely an attacker doesn't have access to your running binary let alone source code, and if they probe it like a pentester would it will be noisy and blocked/flagged by your WAF.

▲

sandeepkd 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What is being phrased as obscurity is one of the approaches to security as long as you are able to keep the code safe. Your passwords, security keys are just random combination of strings, the fact that they are obscure from everyone is what provides you the security

▲

pcblues 2 days ago | parent [-]

Decompilation and you are back to the level of security you started with. OpenSSH is open for a good reason. Please acknowledge your error. Are you AI?

	▲	Terretta 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		How do you decompile a SaaS? They're a SaaS. OTOH, their position seems to be "many LLMs make shallow bugs" is unhelpful; same as many eyes make shallow bugs considered unhelpful. What seems genuinely needed by the open source economy to both surface these latent vulns and tamp down finding-slop is a new https://bughook.github.com/your/repo/ that these big LLMs (Mythos, etc.) support. Mythos understands if it's been used to find an vuln, and back end auto-reports verified findings the git service can feed to a Dependabot type tool. Even better, price up Mythos to cover running a background verifier that gets the project, revalidates the issue, before that bughook. Meanwhile, train it on these findings, so its future self doesn't create them.

▲

pixel_popping 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Delaying attacks is a form of valid security.

▲

genxy 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You don't need the source, the LLM has the source, it is called the binary.

▲

eloisant 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

LLM like humans can find vulnerabilities in black boxes. We already established 30 years ago that open source is usually more secure than closed source and that security by obscurity doesn't work.