Remix.run Logo
erikerikson 5 hours ago

The brief linked above[0] was easy to read. IANAL but in it the author seems to say that online tools fail to meet the confidentiality "test" and explains the ruling in clear language.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779377

jeffbee 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't know why you think I did not read it. My remark is an application of the 3-point test in the decision to another system.

erikerikson 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Well, hrrm. I thought that because it seemed to start clearly in the document I linked that something like Google docs wasn't safe, regardless of spell checking feature use. However, following my link again, it seems that the referenced post has been edited or something because going to grab a quote, I found myself in a different document than I remember.

I think in hindsight I was remarking, effectively, these two claims (yours and the courts) don't seem to live in the same world. Not your responsibility to resolve my confusion and different parts of the court system can issue edicts that contradict to be later resolved at higher levels of the system so... Sorry I didn't respond within the full context you wrote.