why bother? jj does it automatically and gives tools to work with such commits, no point to force this on yourself with git

▲

em-bee 21 hours ago | parent [-]

sure, but i don't think it's that big of a deal either way. it's not the specific feature that draws me in. the overall concept of saving everything as a commit is interesting however. not needing to manually commit after adding changes is just a small positive side effect.

	▲	baq 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		yeah, jj is a different way of working with the same underlying data structure that git also operates on. I happen to like it more than git, but it took some using to because they're both used to arrive at the same end result withing mostly the same operations.