Remix.run Logo
scarmig 2 days ago

> I live in a tech heavy, wealthy city. It’s small. No violent crime. Barely any crime at all.

Compare to e.g. Oakland, which recently approved a Flock expansion:

https://oaklandside.org/2025/12/17/oakland-flock-safety-coun...

Why?

https://sfstandard.com/2023/06/09/oakland-crime-police-respo...

https://oaklandside.org/2025/10/08/oakland-watchdog-audit-po...

https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/oakland-police-off...

Now, will Flock help with this? No. But the visceral lack of safety people feel makes them more likely to see it as a necessary evil, not snake oil.

burnt-resistor 2 days ago | parent [-]

Baltimore has metric shittons of police cameras but it's still a dangerous shithole. Cameras don't stop idiot criminals from criming. Baltimore's police suck and the area sucks because there's massive unemployment, cameras aren't a panacea.

archon810 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

We're talking about license plate recognition cameras, not cameras that show a blurry picture of a criminal committing a crime. These LPR cameras absolutely do result in meaningful law enforcement action and help catch criminals.

See San Francisco and their use of LPR cameras like Flock combined with drone surveillance.

https://fb.watch/GvATBMj1bj/

https://abc7news.com/post/how-sfpds-new-investigation-center...

Etc.

MisterTea 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah I don't get the camera supporters. Cameras do nothing. Desperate people aren't concerned about cameras or stopped by them.

JuniperMesos 13 hours ago | parent [-]

Cameras make it easier to gather evidence that will let the criminal justice system try and incarcerate those desperate people. It's a lot harder to commit a crime if you are currently locked in prison.