| ▲ | hnuser123456 3 days ago | |||||||
More like people try doing anything other than use the base OS, and realize the bottom-tier x86 mini-PCs are 3-4x faster for the same price, and can encode a basic video stream without bogging down. If the RPI came with any recent mid-tier Snapdragon SOC, it might be interesting. Or if someone made a Linux distro that supports all devices on one of the Snapdragon X Elite laptops, that would be interesting. Instead, it's more like the equivalent of a cheap desktop with integrated GPU from 20 years ago, on a single board, with decent linux support, and GPIO. So it's either a linux learning toy, or an integrated component within another product, and not much in between. | ||||||||
| ▲ | adrian_b 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Qualcomm has rebranded a Snapdragon with quadruple Cortex-A78 cores (and 4 small Cortex-A55), from the expensive smartphones of 2021, as "Dragonwing" QCM6490 and they now sell it for embedded devices. There are at least 3 or 4 SBCs with it, in RPI sizes and prices. Cortex-A78 is much faster than the Cortex-A76 from RK3588 or the latest RPI (e.g. at least 50% faster at the same clock frequency), and its speed at the same clock frequency does not differ much from that of recent medium-size cores like Cortex-A720 or Cortex-A725. Cortex-A78 is the stage when Arm stopped making significant micro-architectural changes in medium-sized cores. The later improvements were in the bigger Cortex-X cores. The main disadvantage of the older Cortex-A78 is that it does not implement the SVE instruction set of the Armv9-A ISA. While mini-PCs with Intel/AMD CPUs are usually preferable, for an ARM SBC I would no longer buy any model that has older cores than Cortex-A78. Besides the Qualcomm Dragonwing based SBCs, there are also Cortex-A78 based SBCs with Mediatek or NVIDIA CPUs, but those are more expensive. | ||||||||
| ▲ | overfeed 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> So it's either a linux learning toy, or an integrated component within another product, and not much in between. Raspberry Pi are excellent at being general-purpose, full-Linux boxes that consume very low power (some can idle at <1W). Perfect for ambient computing, cron-jobs, MQTT-related hackery, VPN gateways, ad-blocking DNS servers, or anything else that isn't CPU-bound, but benefits from being always available[1]. 1. In my case, this ironically includes orchestrating higher-wattage computers via Wake-on-Lan and powering them down when not needed | ||||||||
| ▲ | charcircuit 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Bottom tier computers were more than $25. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | colechristensen 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It's tiny and low power, I run CI on a Pi5 and do a few other things and experiments on them. | ||||||||